Æ

Issuer Kimissa (Sicily)
Year 317 BC - 305 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value
Currency Litra
Composition Bronze
Weight 2.28 g
Diameter 11 mm
Thickness
Shape Round (irregular)
Technique Hammered
Orientation Variable alignment ↺
Engraver(s)
In circulation to
Reference(s) HGC 2#658 , CNAI#3 , CNS#1
Obverse description Female head to right.
Obverse script
Obverse lettering
Reverse description Bull butting to right.
Reverse script
Reverse lettering
Edge
Mint
Mintage ND (317 BC - 305 BC) - -
Numisquare ID 2407895110
Additional information

Historical Context: This Æ issue from Kimissa, struck between 317 and 305 BC, situates itself within a tumultuous period in Sicilian history, largely dominated by Agathokles of Syracuse. While Kimissa's precise political status is not fully documented, the city likely operated within his sphere of influence, minting essential bronze coinage for local commerce. Such issues were vital for daily transactions during an era of extensive military campaigns and shifting allegiances, reflecting both local economic necessity and civic identity amidst broader regional power struggles.

Artistry: The engraver of this diminutive bronze, as with most ancient minor issues, remains anonymous. Stylistically, the coin would adhere to established Hellenistic Greek traditions prevalent in Sicily during the late 4th century BC. Given its small 11mm flan, the design would have been compact, typically featuring a head of a local deity, nymph, or personification on the obverse, and an animal or civic symbol on the reverse. The artistry, constrained by size, often displays a robust, simplified interpretation of classical forms, characteristic of Sicilian mints striving for clarity on small denominations.

Technical/Grading: For this 11mm bronze, key high-points susceptible to wear would typically include the highest relief areas of the obverse portrait (e.g., hair, forehead, nose) and any prominent features on the reverse motif. Technically, small bronze issues of this period frequently exhibit variations in strike quality. One might anticipate off-centering, uneven strike pressure leading to weaker areas, or minor flan imperfections such as porosity. A well-struck example, centered with full detail on both sides, would be considered exceptional for this type, given the challenges of striking small bronze planchets.

×