See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

88 Ratti - Hamsavati

Issuer Kingdom of Hamsavati
Year 350-400
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Hammered
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field features a standing anthropomorphic figure, possibly a deity or royal personage, depicted in frontal or three-quarter view with elaborate tiered headdress or nimbus rendered in concentric arched lines. The figure appears draped and is rendered in a stylized, archaic South Asian artistic tradition characteristic of early Mon coinage. The entire design is enclosed within a border of raised pellets arranged in a continuous ring near the coin's periphery. The hammered flan exhibits an irregular, slightly convex surface with typical die-struck relief. No legible inscription or legend is present on this side.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (350-400)
Additional information

Hamsavati — identified with the Mon kingdom centered near modern Thaton in Lower Burma — issued these silver punch-marked pieces during a period when Indian mercantile and religious networks were actively reshaping political authority across mainland Southeast Asia. The ratti unit itself derives from the weight of the Abrus precatorius seed, a standard carried overland and by sea from the Subcontinent.

Mitchell's Eastern Attribution series remains the primary reference for this type, though attribution of specific pieces continues to generate scholarly disagreement over which issues belong to Hamsavati proper versus contemporaneous Mon polities in the same region.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE