Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Ortsgemeinde Rindlberg (Federal State of Upper Austria) |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Rectangular |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Green and dark violet notgeld with a letterpress vignette of a female figure in traditional Austrian dress at left, a rural village scene with church steeple in the background. At right, the denomination '75' appears in an oval frame with floral ornaments, above the inscription 'Heller' and headed by 'Gutschein / Ortsgemeinde / Rindlberg'. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Gutschein Ortsgemeinde Rindlberg 75 Heller |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Rindlberg is a small rural community in Upper Austria, and this 75 Heller note is a product of the Notgeld wave that swept Austria between 1920 and 1921, when chronic coin shortages forced even tiny municipalities to issue their own emergency paper. Ortsgemeinde-level issues like this one were printed in small quantities, often by local printers with limited resources, and were redeemable only within the issuing community — making out-of-region survival a matter of chance rather than design.
The 75 Heller denomination is among the more unusual fractional values in Austrian municipal Notgeld, most series clustering around 10, 20, and 50 Heller. Its existence suggests the commune was working around a specific change-making gap rather than following any standard template.