Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Riksens Ständers Banco (Bank of the Estates of the Realm) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1748-1761 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | 190 x 160 mm |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | BANCO-TRANSPORT-SEDEL N:O UTI Riksens Ständers Bårel=Banco hafwer Se= delhafwaren Infatt på Transport=Råfningen Sex Daler Kopparmynt. Och skal thenne Sedel på 6 Daler K.mt gälla uti hwars hand then finnas må, samt af Banquen, wid upwisandet, betalas. Stockholm then Anno 175(7) Dåg Sex Daler K:mt. Cuus Daleri Kupar raba. |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Watermark |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Riksens Ständers Banco — the world's oldest central bank in continuous operation at that time — had been issuing transport notes since the 1660s, and by the mid-eighteenth century the format was well-established but still entirely handwritten in its critical fields: denomination, date, serial elements, and authorizing signatures were all completed manually at issuance. The KM designation refers to Koppar-Mark, the copper-money standard, and reflects Sweden's lingering dependence on the deeply impractical copper plate money that these notes were specifically designed to replace in circulation.
Type 2 of the series introduced minor changes to the printed text layout and signature arrangement relative to Type 1. Because each note required multiple hand-signatures from bank officials, forgery was considered less likely than with later printed notes — a reasonable assumption that proved wrong when a major counterfeiting scandal shook the bank in the 1750s.