See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5000 Rupiah

Issuer Bank Indonesia
Year 1958
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size 171 × 95 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering BARANGSIAPA MENIRU ATAU MEMALSUKAN UANG KERTAS DAN BARANGSIAPA MENGELUARKAN DENGAN SENGADJA ATAU MENJIMPAN UANG KERTAS TIRUAN ATAU UANG KERTAS JANG DIPALSUKAN AKAN DITUNTUT DIMUKA HAKIM BARANGSIAPA MENIRU ATAU MEMALSUKAN UANG KERTAS DAN BARANGSIAPA MENGELUARKAN DENGAN SENGADJA ATAU MENJIMPAN UANG KERTAS TIRUAN ATAU UANG KERTAS JANG DIPALSUKAN AKAN DITUNTUT DIMUKA HAKIM BARANGSIAPA MENIRU ATAU MEMALSUKAN UANG KERTAS DAN BARANGSIAPA MENGELUARKAN DENGAN SENGADJA ATAU MENJIMPAN UANG KERTAS TIRUAN ATAU UANG KERTAS JANG DIPALSUKAN AKAN DITUNTUT DIMUKA HAKIM
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Watermark
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Percetakan Kebayoran was among the earliest printing facilities operated domestically by an independent Indonesian government, and this 1958 issue reflects the ambition — and the limits — of that self-sufficiency. The 5000 Rupiah denomination was the highest value in the series, at a time when hyperinflationary pressure was already eroding the currency's purchasing power significantly.

The P#64 is one of the few notes from this period designed by a named Indonesian designer rather than contracted to European security printers. Junalies is rarely documented in philatelic literature, which makes attribution here genuinely unusual for the era.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE