See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

500 Pesos Oro

Issuer Banco de la República
Year 1973
Type Standard circulation banknote
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The central vignette presents a finely engraved intaglio view of the underground salt cathedral of Zipaquirá, rendered with architectural detail and chiaroscuro shading. The Banco de la República circular seal is positioned at left, with the denomination in words appearing beneath it, while the face value in numerals is placed at upper left. The inscription identifying the subject runs along the lower margin, and the denomination in words is split vertically along the right border.
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Watermark
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Colombia's 500 Pesos Oro denomination had a long run with the American Bank Note Company, and by 1973 the relationship between Bogotá and the New York printer was well established — ABNC had been producing Colombian paper currency for decades. The 500-peso note occupied the upper tier of everyday circulation at a time when inflation was beginning to erode the purchasing power of smaller denominations with some seriousness.

Pick 416 is distinguished from closely related issues primarily by its date and signature combinations, which changed frequently across the series as Banco de la República rotated its board signatories. Collectors working this series need to track those pairings carefully — a wrong assumption about signature variety can shift catalog attribution entirely.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE