See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

50 Pfennig - Mülheim an der Ruhr

Issuer Mülheim an der Ruhr, City of
Year 1918
Type Log in to see details
Value 50 Pfennigs (50 Pfennige) (0.50)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field bears the quartered municipal coat of arms of Mülheim an der Ruhr, featuring heraldic devices within a shield. The legend STADT appears above the arms and MÜLHEIM / A.D.RUHR below, divided across two lines, all rendered in bold raised lettering. The design occupies the full face of the square flan with rounded corners, with no additional ornamental border beyond the edge of the planchet.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The large numeral 50 dominates the central field as the principal denomination indicator, rendered in bold raised figures. Above, the legend KRIEGSGELD and the date 1918 are inscribed in two lines across the upper portion of the flan. The word PFENNIG appears in the lower field beneath the numeral, completing the denomination inscription. The composition is plain and functional, consistent with wartime emergency coinage (Notgeld) production.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Mülheim an der Ruhr issued this iron notgeld piece in 1918 as wartime metal requisitioning had stripped Germany's mints of copper and nickel. Iron was a poor substitute — prone to corrosion, difficult to strike cleanly, and widely resented by the public — but it was what the war economy permitted. Most surviving examples show at least surface rust, making problem-free specimens harder to locate than mintage figures alone would suggest.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE