Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Casa de Moneda de México |
|---|---|
| Year | 1955 |
| Type | Coin pattern |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | The Mexican national arms displayed in high relief at center: an eagle facing left, wings spread, perched atop a prickly-pear cactus growing from a rocky islet, grasping a serpent in its beak and talons. The base is adorned with a wreath of oak and laurel branches tied with a ribbon. The encircling legend ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS arcs around the upper periphery in raised Latin letters, all contained within a beaded border. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS (Translation: United Mexican States) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Pattern coinage from Casa de Moneda de México in this period reflects the mint's repeated attempts to find a workable replacement for the silver-heavy 50 centavos then in circulation. By the mid-1950s, rising silver prices were making the existing alloy economically untenable, and copper-nickel was among several compositions tested before a final solution was adopted. This piece was never approved for circulation.
The 14-gram weight is notably heavy for the denomination — heavier, in fact, than the circulating silver type it was meant to replace — suggesting this particular specification was rejected on practical as much as economic grounds.