See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

5 Fen - Guangxu

Issuer Kirin Province
Year 1898-1908
Type Log in to see details
Value 5 Fen (0.05)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Chinese
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description At center, a sinuous Chinese dragon is depicted in high relief, facing forward with a flaming pearl at its center. An English legend arcs above and below the dragon along the coin's rim, identifying the province of issue and the denomination in candareens. Manchu script characters flank the dragon to the left and right in the field, identifying the issuing empire. The design follows the standard format established for Qing provincial dragon coinage of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Kirin Province operated one of the more chaotic mint histories in late Qing China. The provincial mint at Jilin city opened in 1884 and struggled chronologically with inconsistent silver supplies drawn from local trade flows rather than centralized bullion — a persistent problem that contributed to irregular production runs across the entire Guangxu period. The decade-long date range on this type reflects interrupted rather than continuous output.

Y#179 at this denomination is notably elusive in any grade, almost certainly due to low survival rather than low original mintage.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE