Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Reserve Bank of New Zealand |
|---|---|
| Year | 1981 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 2.83 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A mule reverse employing the Canadian 10 cents die (KM#77), depicting the famous racing schooner Bluenose under full sail, heeling to the left amid stylised waves. The legend 'CANADA' arcs above the vessel, '10 CENTS' appears below in the exergue area, and the date '1981' is positioned to the right of the design. This die was struck in error in combination with a New Zealand 5 cents obverse die, creating a notable numismatic mule. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
KM#64 designates what is technically a mule — the obverse die from the smaller circulation coinage was paired with mismatched reverse tooling during a production run at the Royal Australian Mint, which struck New Zealand's coinage under contract during this period. Mules of this type emerged without deliberate intent and were released into circulation before the error was caught.
New Zealand's 1981 five-cent mules are documented but not exhaustively catalogued by die marriage, leaving the true extent of the striking still debated among specialists.