See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

4 Rundstück - Carl XI Without inner reverse circle

Issuer Narva, City of
Year 1671
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Mark (1663-1704)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A crowned shield bearing the arms of the City of Narva — depicting stacked crossed swords and a fish — occupies the central field, with the denomination numeral and mintmaster's initials flanking the shield. The surrounding Latin legend giving the coin's authority and date runs along the periphery, notably without an inner circle, distinguishing this variety from related issues.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering MON : ARG : CIV : NARVA : 1671 4 - R LN
(Translation: Moneta Argentea Civitatis Narva Silver coin of the City of Narva)
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Narva's civic coinage authority was a product of Swedish imperial administration — the city operated under Charles XI, whose minority government had only recently assumed direct control following the regency period that ended in 1672. This piece predates that transition by a year, placing it squarely in the contested administrative moment before the young king consolidated personal rule. The missing inner reverse circle distinguishes it from the standard type and is catalogued separately by Fedorov precisely because the omission appears to reflect a die preparation decision rather than wear or damage.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE