See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

25 Yuan Panda, Bimetallic

Issuer People's Republic of China
Year 1996
Type Log in to see details
Value 25 Yuan (25元)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering 中华人民共和国 含纯金1/4盎司成色.999 含纯银1/8盎司成色.999 1996
Reverse description The gold centre depicts a giant panda seated amongst bamboo shoots and foliage, rendered in high relief with naturalistic detail characteristic of the Chinese Panda bullion series. The panda is shown in a relaxed posture, facing left. The denomination 25元 is inscribed within the gold centre field to the upper right of the panda. The silver outer ring carries the bilingual fineness inscription 1/4oz Au.999+1/8oz Ag.999 along the upper arc in Latin characters, confirming the bimetallic composition of the coin.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The bimetallic Panda issues of the mid-1990s emerged from the Chinese Mint's effort to expand the Panda program beyond its standard single-metal format, experimenting with gold-in-silver construction at a time when bimetallic coinage technology was gaining traction globally following the success of the Italian 500 Lire. The 1996 issue was produced in relatively small quantities compared to the bullion Pandas of the same year, and the dual KM references reflect ongoing cataloguing disagreements between early and revised editions of Krause rather than any genuine variety distinction.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE