See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ24

Issuer Olbia
Year 330 BC - 280 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Bearded head of the river-god Borysthenes facing left, rendered in bold relief with flowing, deeply engraved locks of hair and a full beard rendered in undulating strands. Two short bovine horns rise from the forehead, emblematic of the deity's fluvial nature. The facial features are modelled in a vigorous Hellenistic style, with a prominent brow, large eye, and aquiline nose. The flan is characteristically irregular, as typical of Olbian civic bronze coinage of this period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Olbia, the Milesian colony at the mouth of the Hypanis (modern Bug River), was one of the earliest Greek cities to experiment with cast bronze coinage — the famous "dolphin" and "arrow" primitives — before transitioning to struck issues like this one. By the late 4th century, Olbia was navigating increasing pressure from Scythian tribes inland while maintaining profitable grain and slave trade with the Aegean world. The civic bronze issues of this period were the workhorse currency of that commerce.

The broad date range assigned to this type reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty rather than carelessness — the absence of datable hoards containing this specific issue makes tighter attribution difficult.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE