See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

200 Escudos Australia

Issuer Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda (INCM)
Year 1995
Type Log in to see details
Value 200 Escudos (200 PTE)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description The Portuguese national shield superimposed on an armillary sphere occupies the central field, rendered in a bold, graphic style characteristic of Portugal's late 20th-century commemorative coinage. The armillary sphere bears the legend 'M R O E' along its ecliptic band, widely interpreted as the Latin abbreviation 'Maximus Rex Orbis Emmanuel,' a reference to King Manuel I. The denomination '200 ESC' and the date '1995' appear in the lower field, flanked by the country name 'REPUBLICA PORTUGUESA' arching below.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage 1995 incm - - 750,000
Additional information

Portugal's 200 Escudos commemorative series, struck through the 1990s, used the Australian theme to mark the 1995 bicentennial of the first Portuguese contact with the continent's southwest coast — specifically Bruny d'Entrecasteaux's 1792 voyage, though the deeper Portuguese claim traces to Cristóvão de Mendonça's disputed passage of around 1522. That earlier voyage remains unresolved in the historical record, making the commemorative's implied priority argument quietly contentious among Australian maritime historians.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE