Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Thesouro Nacional |
|---|---|
| Year | 1844 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Intaglio-printed in blue on yellow paper, with the Imperial distinction vignette at left, a central allegorical scene representing the Discovery of Brazil above, and the Arms of the Empire at right. The denomination and serial number are typeset, with the order number applied by handstamp. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Unprinted yellow paper reverse, bearing only handwritten and manuscript notations added in circulation, consistent with this type of mid-19th century Brazilian Treasury issue. |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Perkins, Bacon & Petch — at the time still operating under that transitional name before settling as Perkins, Bacon & Co. — were the dominant security printers of the mid-nineteenth century, best known for their siderographic steel engraving process, which made plate duplication and counterfeiting exceptionally difficult. Brazil's Imperial Treasury turned to them repeatedly across multiple print runs of this series, a reasonable choice for a government that had been battling note forgery since the 1820s.
The "3rd print" designation matters here. Each successive print run of this denomination carried subtle differences in plate state and overprint details, and misidentification between runs is common. Collectors distinguishing between them should focus on the serial number typography and any manuscript annotations rather than the core engraved design, which remained largely consistent across printings.