Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Central Bank of the Bahamas |
|---|---|
| Year | 1993 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Thomas De La Rue & Company, London, United Kingdom |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Red and black intaglio print on a multicolour guilloche underprint; a three-quarter left-facing portrait vignette of Sir Milo B. Butler occupies the centre-right, flanked at left by a horse-and-carriage vignette and a see-through registration device incorporating the bank logo. An outline map of the Bahamas Islands is positioned at centre, with the watermark window reserved at right. Black serial numbers are printed in letterpress. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Sailing ship watermark visible in the reserved window area |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Pick 54 belongs to the Bahamas' second major definitive series, introduced following the country's shift away from the imagery-heavy notes of the 1970s toward a cleaner, more internationally legible design language. Thomas De La Rue had been the Bahamas' printer of choice across multiple series by this point, and the relationship showed — the registration on these notes is tight, the color separation precise.
For a $20 denomination, the security specification is notably lean. A watermark alone, with no security thread, places this issue behind contemporaneous regional peers. Whether that reflected a budget decision or an assessment of local counterfeiting risk is not documented in the Bank's published record.