Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Danish East India Company |
|---|---|
| Year | 1767-1807 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1767 - - 1768 - - 1769 - - 1770 - - 1771 - - 1772 - - 1773 - - 1773 - - 1774 - - 1775 - - 1776 - - 1779 - - 1780 - - 1781 - - 1783 - - 1784 - - 1786 - - 1787 - - 1788 - - 1789 - - 1792 - - 1793 - - 1794 - - 1795 - - 1796 - - 1797 - - 1799 - - 1807 - - |
| Additional information |
The Danish East India Company's Tranquebar settlement — a coastal enclave in southeastern India held by Denmark from 1620 until its sale to the British East India Company in 1845 — produced its own coinage denominated in local units specifically to function within regional trade networks. The fanon, or fanam, was a denomination already familiar to Indian merchants along the Coromandel Coast, and the Danish decision to adopt it rather than impose European denominations reflects a practical commercial calculation rather than any administrative principle.
The forty-year production window for KM#171 spans a period when the Company's Tranquebar operations were in slow decline, squeezed by British dominance of regional trade.