Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Kwangsi Province |
|---|---|
| Year | 1924 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | The obverse features multiple Chinese ideograms arranged in a traditional format: four characters reading top to bottom and right to left around the central field, with a single ideogram prominently placed at the centre. The surrounding legend, rendered in classical Chinese script, gives the date as Year 13 of the Republic of China, identifies the denomination as 2 Jiao, and specifies the issuing authority as Kwangsi Province, with the additional 'Kuei' provincial designator. The design is enclosed within a beaded inner border and a plain outer rim. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | 年三十國民華中 貳 幣桂銀 毫 造省西廣 (Translation: Year 13 of the Republic of China 2 Jiao / Silver coin Kuei Made in Kwangsi Province) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Kwangsi (Guangxi) Province sat at the southern periphery of Republican China's monetary system, and its silver issues from the early 1920s reflect exactly that position — produced with inconsistent oversight, in limited quantities, and with die variations that were never systematically catalogued. The "Kuei" character addition on this piece distinguishes it from the standard Y#415, likely introduced to differentiate provincial striking batches, though the administrative logic behind it was never formally documented.
The unlisted Y# status is telling. Kann's attribution at 750a places it within a known family, but the variety sits outside the main sequence.