See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

2 Falus - Moulay 'Abd al-Rahman 3rd Standard, Tetuan

Issuer Morocco
Year 1855-1859
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 7.06 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Plain, worn field bearing the mint name and AH date in Arabic script, appearing in two lines at center. The legends are weakly struck as is characteristic of cast coinage of the Sharifian mints, with the inscription identifying the Tetuan mint and the regnal year. The surface shows considerable roughness and porosity consistent with the casting technique employed at the Tetuan mint under Sultan Moulay Abd al-Rahman.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering تطوان 1271
(Translation: Tetuan 1271)
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Moulay 'Abd al-Rahman ruled Morocco from 1822 until his death in 1859, presiding over a sultanate increasingly pressed by European commercial interests and, after 1844, the humiliation of Isly — a defeat by French forces that exposed the limits of Moroccan military capacity. The Tetuan mint was one of several provincial facilities producing falus coinage during this period, and output consistency between mints was never a priority. Weights and module vary enough across surviving examples that the C#126b subdivision itself reflects documented die and fabric differences rather than a clean typological split.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE