Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Utrecht, Province of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1650-1720 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Gulden (1581-1795) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Royal Dutch Mint (Koninklijke Nederlandse Munt), Utrecht, Netherlands (1010-date) |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Utrecht's ducat production in this period occupied an awkward administrative position: the province was simultaneously bound by the States-General's coinage ordinances and resistant to them, resulting in periodic disputes over fineness standards and the right to strike double ducats at all. The "early type" designation separates these pieces from later Utrecht output where die workmanship noticeably declined, a deterioration well-documented in Delmonte's comparative die studies.
Dutch gold ducats of this type circulated far beyond the Republic's borders — extensively through the Baltic trade and into the Ottoman Empire — which is why so many survivors show the kind of edge wear inconsistent with domestic handling.