See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

2 Dollars Silver Certificate, 'Educational Series'

Issuer United States Treasury
Year 1896
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Obverse: Charles Schlecht, George Frederick Cumming Smillie
Reverse: Lorenzo James Hatch
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse lettering THIS CERTIFIES THAT THERE HAVE BEEN DEPOSITED IN THE TREASURY OF THE 2 UNITED STATES 2 TWO SILVER DOLLARS PAYABLE TO THE BEARER ON DEMAND WASHINGTON D.C. ACT OF AUGUST 1886
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering 2 UNITED STATES 2 THIS CERTIFICATE IS RECEIVABLE FOR CUSTOMS TAXES AND ALL PUBLIC DUES AND WHEN SO RECEIVED MAY BE REISSUED
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

The Educational Series of 1896 was the last genuine attempt by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to produce American currency as high art. Edwin Blashfield was a muralist working in the tradition of the American Renaissance, and the BEP recruited him specifically to design allegorical compositions worthy of intaglio reproduction — an unusually ambitious brief for a government printer. The series was killed almost immediately by public complaint: too elaborate, too allegorical, and the reverse portraits of historical figures were considered by contemporary critics to be rendered unflattering to the point of disrespect.

Charles Schlecht and G.F.C. Smillie engraved the face. Smillie in particular was the BEP's finest portraitist of the period, and his involvement on a non-portrait subject says something about how seriously the bureau took this commission.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE