Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Reserve Bank of New Zealand |
|---|---|
| Year | 1985 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Plain field featuring the Royal Mint's official logo struck at centre, depicting a stylised representation of the Tower of London within a rounded rectangular frame with two flanking turrets, serving as the mint identification mark. To the right of the logo, a partial mark or notation is faintly visible in the field. No surrounding legend or additional design elements are present, consistent with a working trial or pattern piece submitted for evaluation. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
New Zealand's 1985 coinage patterns were produced as the Reserve Bank evaluated a full metric decimalization of the circulating series, testing aluminium-brass as a lower-cost alternative to the existing cupro-nickel alloy. The $2 denomination had particular urgency — a high-value circulating coin was considered preferable to the paper note it would eventually replace.
The $2 coin did not enter circulation until 1990, and these 1985 pattern strikes predate that decision by five years of internal review.