Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 240 BC - 225 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 2 Asses = 1 Dupondius |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The heavy cast bronze coinages of Etruria remain among the least understood of all Italian pre-Roman issues, with mint attributions still contested across the major references. This two-as denomination belongs to a series produced in the decades when Roman military pressure was steadily compressing Etruscan political autonomy — most of the region's cities had capitulated or been absorbed by the mid-third century. Whether this piece originated at Populonia, Volterra, or one of the smaller inland centers is a question the references disagree on without resolution.
At over 300 grams, these pieces were never convenient. The aes grave tradition demanded weight integrity over portability, and that discipline held even as Rome itself was already moving toward lighter, struck coinage.