کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Amphipolis, City of |
|---|---|
| سال | 187 BC - 31 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | |
| واحد پول | Drachm |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 6 g |
| قطر | 18 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | Moush`25#5987, SNG ANS 7#127 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Diademed head of Poseidon right. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Horse standing right. |
| خط پشت سکه | Greek |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه |
AMΦIΠOΛITΩN (Translation: Amphipolis) |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (187 BC - 31 BC) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 2262463410 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This Æ18 bronze coin originates from Amphipolis, a strategically vital city in Macedon, during the Late Hellenistic period (187-31 BC). Its issuance spans a tumultuous era, transitioning from Macedonian independence to Roman dominance after the Battle of Pydna in 168 BC. Amphipolis subsequently became the capital of the First Meris of Macedon under Roman administration, retaining significant civic autonomy. This coinage reflects the city's enduring economic activity and its assertion of local identity amidst shifting imperial powers, serving as essential currency for daily commerce within its sphere of influence.
Artistry: While individual engravers for these bronze issues remain anonymous, the coin exemplifies the Late Hellenistic stylistic school. This period is characterized by a blend of classical Greek idealism with an increasing emphasis on realism and often more robust, expressive portraiture. The designs typically feature civic or religious iconography pertinent to Amphipolis, such as heads of local deities or personifications on the obverse, and significant symbols on the reverse. The artistic execution would aim for clarity and impact, reflecting the city's cultural heritage through established numismatic traditions.
Technical/Grading: This 18mm, 6-gram bronze coin would be evaluated based on strike quality, centering, and surface preservation. High-points for wear typically include the hair, forehead, and cheekbones on any obverse portrait, and prominent elements of the reverse device. Well-struck examples exhibit full details on the central devices, minimal flan imperfections, and a well-centered design. Conversely, issues common to ancient bronzes include off-centering, weak strikes due to insufficient pressure or worn dies, and surface pitting. A strong strike and good metal quality are crucial for a high-grade specimen.