See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1/4 Stater with intertwined lines

Issuer Caleti
Year 80 BC - 50 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) LT#8697, DT#95-96, GCV#119, Sp#9, V#37, ABC#37, Mack#8, Sp#8, V#35, Mack#6
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A stylized horse leaping to the left, rendered in the abstract Celtic manner with balled or pellet-tipped limbs. Behind the horse, fragmentary vestiges of a charioteer figure are visible, with a vertical pole or driving rod positioned upright. Beneath the horse, a lyre motif lies horizontally to the left, serving as a decorative subsidiary symbol characteristic of the Caleti coinage series. The entire composition is executed in the schematized, highly abstracted La Tène style, with no inscription or legend present.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Caleti were a small Belgic tribe occupying the coastal strip of what is now the Seine-Maritime department of Normandy, wedged between the more powerful Veliocasses and the sea. Caesar mentions them only in passing, but their territory's position made them unavoidable participants in the broader Belgic resistance of the mid-first century BC. Whether this fractional coinage circulated as a functional medium of exchange or served primarily as a mechanism for paying warriors and settling obligations among the elite remains an open question — the archaeological findspot distribution is too thin for conclusions.

The dense cross-referencing across LT, DT, ABC, and Mack reflects decades of scholarly disagreement about Caletic attribution and die groupings rather than any exceptional complexity in the type itself.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE