See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ14

Issuer Kingdom of Cappadocia
Year 96 BC - 63 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Athena Nikephoros standing left, holding Nike in her extended right hand and a spear and shield in her left, with a grain ear or palm frond visible to the right of the figure. The Greek legend ΕΥΣΕΒΕΙΑΣ (meaning 'of Piety') appears partially around the figure in the field, referencing the epithet of the Cappadocian king. The flan is irregular and the surfaces are heavily worn and corroded, limiting full legibility.
Reverse script Greek
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

RPC I 3612 falls within the late Ariarathid and early Ariobarzanid period of Cappadocian kingship — a stretch of decades marked by relentless interference from both Rome and Pontus. Mithridates VI of Pontus effectively installed and removed Cappadocian kings at will during much of this window, at one point placing his own son on the throne under the name Ariarathes IX. Roman senatorial intervention eventually restored Ariobarzanes I, though his hold on the kingdom remained precarious throughout his reign.

Small bronze issues like this one served local transactional needs in a kingdom whose silver coinage was closely tied to royal legitimacy and diplomatic signaling — making the attribution of unsigned bronzes to specific reigns genuinely difficult.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE