Catalog
| Issuer | Phenicia, Satrapy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 346 BC - 342 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1⁄16 Shekel |
| Currency | Shekel (539-332 BCE) |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | 0.60 g |
| Diameter | 11 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | BMC Greek#67 |
| Obverse description | Phoenician date |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Phoenician letter |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | 90 |
| Edge | Rough |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (346 BC - 342 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1006172360 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: Evagoras II ruled as King of Salamis, Cyprus, and later served as a Persian-appointed satrap in Phoenicia during the late Achaemenid period (346-342 BC). This silver 1/16 Shekel was issued during a turbulent era marked by shifting regional power dynamics and Persian attempts to consolidate control over their western territories. Evagoras II's coinage reflects his significant political influence and the economic needs of a region crucial for trade and military operations, bridging Cypriot and Phoenician spheres under Persian suzerainty.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, this coin exhibits characteristics of the Late Classical Greek stylistic school, common in Achaemenid satrapal issues. The obverse likely features a deity, such as the head of Herakles wearing a lion-skin headdress, a popular motif symbolizing strength and divine protection. The reverse, given the diminutive 11mm flan, would bear a simplified yet recognizable symbol, possibly a lion or a galley prow, emblematic of Phoenician maritime power or local authority, rendered with a degree of Hellenistic influence.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 0.60 grams and measuring 11mm, this 1/16 Shekel presents typical challenges for strike quality. High points on the obverse, such as the forehead, nose, and details of the lion-skin, often show weakness due to insufficient strike pressure or die wear. The reverse motif, if intricate, may appear incomplete. Centering is frequently off, resulting in partial legends or design elements. A well-struck example would exhibit full detail on both sides with minimal flan irregularities, commanding a premium.