Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Bank of Uganda |
|---|---|
| Year | 1994 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1000 Shillings |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The central field depicts a dynamic football scene commemorating the 1994 FIFA World Cup: a large foreground figure of a footballer in mid-kick strikes the ball toward a goal, with a corner flag prominently positioned at center, and three additional players rendered in smaller scale near the goalmouth at right. The composition is set on a stylized pitch surface. The fineness mark 999 appears in the lower left field. The peripheral legend XV WORLD CUP 1994 - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA arcs around the upper and right portions of the coin, bordered by a beaded inner circle and a reeded outer rim. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Pattern issues from Bank of Uganda are rarely documented with precision, and KM#Pn3 is no exception — mintage figures remain unpublished. Uganda's mid-1990s monetary environment was still stabilizing after decades of disruption under Amin and Obote, and the 1000-shilling denomination at that point represented a relatively high face value for a circulating coin. Whether this pattern was rejected on cost grounds or simply superseded by a revised design is not recorded in standard references.