Catalog
| Issuer | National Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina |
|---|---|
| Year | 1992 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | First Dinar (1992-1994) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | The face is dominated by a large guilloche underprint filled with repeating fleur-de-lis motifs across the entire field, with the numeral "100" in large outline figures at left-centre. The national arms of Bosnia and Herzegovina appear at upper right, accompanied by bilingual issuer text in Latin and Cyrillic scripts. A governor's signature and the date "1. Kolovoz - August 1992" are printed below the arms at right. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | REPUBLIKA BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA РЕПУБЛИКА БОСНА И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНА BON - БОН STO DINARA СТО ДИНАРА (Translation: Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina / Voucher / One Hundred Dinara) |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Printed at Oslobođenje's Sarajevo facility in 1992, this note was produced under siege conditions — the city was surrounded and under shelling by the time the National Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina was issuing its first independent currency. Oslobođenje, primarily a newspaper publisher, was pressed into banknote production out of necessity, not design. The plant continued operating through the siege, famously never missing a daily edition throughout the entire conflict.
Paper and ink supplies were intermittent, and quality varies considerably across surviving examples as a direct result of wartime shortages rather than inconsistent printing standards.