Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Private individual (Jane Arnett) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1706 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Yes |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | August 1706 |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Embossed blind stamp bearing a crowned royal cipher at the lower left of the obverse, consistent with period English fiscal stamping practice |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Private promissory notes of this type were legally enforceable instruments under English common law well before any formal banking infrastructure existed in provincial Britain. The sum — ten pounds and four shillings — is oddly specific, almost certainly reflecting an actual debt rather than a round commercial transaction: payment for goods, a loan repayment, or a settlement of account between known parties.
The embossed stamp indicates compliance with the Stamp Act of 1694, which required duty on promissory notes and gave them their legal standing. A note bearing this feature was not casual paperwork — it was taxed, witnessed, and intended to hold up if contested.
Female issuers at this date are uncommon but not unknown, typically widows or women of independent property acting in their own right under coverture exceptions.