See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

10 Pfennigs - Scharley Stephan, Frölich & Klüpfel

Issuer Stephan, Frölich & Klüpfel (Scharley, Upper Silesia)
Year
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Men18#28270.4 , Hasselmann#829.4
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description An outer pearl border follows the octagonal flan, enclosing a rope-twist inner circle. The legend KLEINGELDERSATZMARKE (small change substitute token) arcs around the upper portion of the rope circle in raised Latin lettering. The large numeral '10' is prominently centered within the rope circle, with three small six-pointed star ornaments arranged at the base of the inner circle in the lower field.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Scharley was a coal-mining settlement in Upper Silesia whose industrial operators routinely issued their own token coinage — Werksgeld — to pay miners in scrip redeemable only at company-owned stores. Stephan, Frölich & Klüpfel were among the colliery operators who used this system to keep wages circulating within their own economy. The practice was widespread enough in Silesian mining districts that dedicated token catalogs like Hasselmann's exist solely to document them.

Zinc was the material of necessity during wartime shortages, placing this piece almost certainly within the First World War period.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE