See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

10 Nummi - Justin I Constantinople

Issuer Byzantine Empire (Byzantine states)
Year 518-527
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency First Solidus Nomisma (498-720)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse bears the large Greek numeral I (representing ten nummi) prominently centered in the field, surmounted by a cross potent, the standard denominational type introduced by Anastasius I and continued under Justin I. Two six-pointed stars or asterisks flank the central I, one to the left and one to the right of the vertical stroke. The mint signature CON appears in the exergue below, identifying Constantinople as the place of issue. The design is bold and schematic, consistent with the functional aesthetic of early Byzantine fractional bronze coinage.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Justin I came to power in 518 as an illiterate Macedonian soldier who relied heavily on his nephew Justinian to manage administrative affairs — the 10 Nummi fraction being among the smallest bronze denominations struck under his name. The Constantinople mint was the dominant production center throughout his reign, with provincial mints at Nicomedia and Thessalonica playing secondary roles.

BCV 71 covers considerable die variation within the type, and attributing individual pieces precisely within the 518–527 span remains difficult without strong officina marks.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE