Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | National Bank of Ukraine |
|---|---|
| Year | 2001-2013 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 1.7 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Cyrillic |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The denomination numeral '10' dominates the central field in bold raised figures, with the Cyrillic inscription КОПІЙОК (kopiiok) positioned immediately below in a complementary typeface. The entire design is enclosed within an ornamental border of interlacing vine scrolls and berry clusters rendered in relief, framing the denomination in a decorative folk-art style characteristic of early post-independence Ukrainian coinage. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Ukraine's aluminium bronze coinage of this period reflects a quiet but deliberate materials shift driven by metal cost pressures and vending machine compatibility requirements that plagued the post-Soviet hryvnia system through the early 2000s. The non-magnetic distinction separates this from later steel-core issues introduced as nickel and copper prices climbed sharply after 2008.
The Luhansk Mint — one of two Ukrainian facilities striking circulation coinage during this run — applied its mintmark inconsistently in early years, creating attribution headaches that still divide collectors working from die-state evidence alone.