Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | De Nederlandsche Bank |
|---|---|
| Year | 1968 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Rectangular |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Portrait of Frans Hals facing right occupies the right portion of the note, rendered in dark red intaglio style on a pale ground. A guilloche underprint panel appears to the left, overlaid with two facsimile signatures above the issuer and denomination legends. Large numeral "10" anchors both left and lower-right corners. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | amsterdam 25 april 1968 secretaris president de nederlandsche bank TIEN GULDEN 10 |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
The 1968 10 Gulden was printed by Joh. Enschedé en Zonen in Haarlem, the firm that handled virtually all Dutch banknote production throughout the postwar period. At 85 × 41 mm it was among the smallest denominations in the series by physical size, a deliberate tiering that allowed cashiers and the public to distinguish notes by touch as much as sight.
The series it belongs to — the "Portrait series" designed by Ootje Oxenaar — would launch in 1966 with the 10 Gulden as its opening entry, making this note the first Dutch issue to break decisively from the conservative, engraving-heavy aesthetic that had defined Nederlandse Bank notes since the war. Oxenaar's flat, modernist graphic approach was deeply controversial at the time.