See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

10 Fen - Guangxu Pattern, silver

Issuer Szechuan Province
Year 1897
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Silver
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field displays the four large Chinese characters 光 (Guang), 緒 (Xu), 元 (Yuan), and 寶 (Bao) — reading 'Guangxu Yuanbao' (Original Treasure of the Guangxu Emperor) — arranged around a smaller vertical Manchu script inscription at center. The surrounding legend along the upper arc reads 四川省造 (Made in Szechuan Province) in Chinese, with additional Manchu characters flanking the central inscription. The lower arc bears the weight denomination 庫平七分二釐 (7.2 Candareens, Treasury standard) in Chinese. Small decorative rosettes appear in the field between the legend elements. The entire design is enclosed within a beaded inner border and an outer milled rim.
Obverse script Chinese, Manchu
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Szechuan's pattern coinages of the 1890s were produced as the province negotiated the introduction of machine-struck currency against considerable resistance from Beijing, which was wary of provincial mints accumulating independent monetary infrastructure. This piece predates the province's authorized circulation issues by several years and was almost certainly struck in very small numbers for official inspection rather than any intended release.

The "var." designation against KM#Pn9 suggests a die or specification difference from the primary recorded specimen — likely in the arrangement of characters or a subtle gauge variation — but documentation remains thin enough that attribution is still disputed among specialists.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE