Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
10 Cash - Guangxu Pei Yang, redesigned dragon
| Issuer | Chihli Province |
|---|---|
| Year | 1906 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Y#67.4 |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | ᠪᠠᡩᠠᠷᠠᠩᡤᠠ ᡩᠣᠷᠣ ᡳ᠋ ᠶᡠᠸᠠᠨ ᠪᠣᠣ 洋北 光 寶元 緒 文十錢制當 (Translation: Guangxu (Emperor) / Yuanbao (Original currency) Pei Yang Guangxu (Emperor) / Yuanbao (Original currency) 10 Cash currency) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Pei Yang Arsenal mint at Tianjin had been striking machine-made copper cash since the late 1890s, but the 1906 dragon redesign reflects the Qing court's repeated and largely unsuccessful attempts to standardize coinage across competing provincial mints. Each province jealously guarded its minting revenues, and Chihli — the metropolitan province surrounding Beijing — was no exception. The dragon itself went through several distinct iterations at this mint, making die variety attribution the primary challenge for serious collectors of this type.
Y#67.4 denotes a specific variant within a crowded subtype sequence. The differences between adjacent catalog numbers are subtle enough that misattribution is routine in general-market sales.