Catalog
| Issuer | Kaunos |
|---|---|
| Year | 191 BC - 166 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 1.20 g |
| Diameter | 10.5 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | SNG Copenhagen#184, SNG Keckman Karia#75, SNG von Aulock#8100 |
| Obverse description | Diademed head of young male facing right |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Cornucopia with the letter K and a monogram flanking |
| Reverse script | |
| Reverse lettering | |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (191 BC - 166 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 3178328610 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Æ10 bronze coin from Kaunos, issued 191-166 BC, reflects a critical period in Carian history. Following the Treaty of Apamea (188 BC), Kaunos, with other Lycian and Carian cities, was granted to the Rhodian Peraea by the Roman Republic. This era placed Kaunos under significant, often contentious, Rhodian influence. The Æ10's production was crucial for local commerce, serving daily economic needs amidst shifting regional power and increasing Roman presence.
Artistry: Specific engravers for diminutive bronzes are rarely known, but this Æ10 aligns with broader Hellenistic stylistic traditions prevalent in Caria and under Rhodian influence. Kaunos bronzes typically feature a deity's head, like Artemis Pergaia, on the obverse, and a local symbol or animal, often a bull or tripod, on the reverse. Execution, constrained by the small flan (10.5 mm), aimed for clarity, reflecting the naturalism and expressive forms characteristic of the era, albeit in miniature.
Technical/Grading: The technical execution of this Æ10 (1.20 grams) is typical for small Hellenistic bronzes. High-points for wear or strike quality include the hair and facial features of any obverse bust, or the musculature and extremities of a reverse animal. Due to rapid production and less meticulous striking, examples frequently exhibit minor off-centring, weak strikes, or uneven flan preparation. Collectors should seek well-centred specimens with strong strikes on both sides, ensuring device legibility despite this denomination's inherent challenges.