See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Thaler

Issuer Bremen, City of
Year 1542-1547
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Thaler
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A large crowned double-headed imperial eagle displayed in the field, with both heads facing outward, wings spread, and talons visible at the base. The imperial crown surmounts the conjoined necks above. The eagle, rendered in the bold hammered style typical of mid-sixteenth-century German thalers, fills the inner circle entirely. The circumferential legend acknowledges the overlordship of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Bremen struck thalers during this period under the authority of its city council, operating as a largely autonomous imperial free city within the Holy Roman Empire. The 1540s were a period of acute religious tension in Bremen — the city had formally adopted Lutheranism in 1522, making it among the earliest major urban centers to break with Rome, and municipal coinage issued in this period carried implicit political weight as an assertion of civic independence from both ecclesiastical and imperial pressure.

The Davenport reference placing this under German Talers I confirms the broad thaler standard, though the relatively tight five-year window suggests a specific authorization rather than a continuous series.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE