Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 668-700 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Solidus |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | N |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
These tremissis-weight imitations — struck by Frankish, Frisian, or possibly Lombard workshops — copied Byzantine solidi of Constantine IV as a matter of commercial credibility, not political allegiance. Byzantine gold was the reserve currency of seventh-century Europe, and any tribe issuing coinage had strong incentive to make it look like Constantinople's product. The copying was deliberate but imperfect, with letter forms degrading across successive die generations as engravers worked from coins rather than from any official template.
Attributing these pieces to a specific tribe remains genuinely contested.