See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Reale d'oro - Carlo I d'Angio

Issuer Sicily, Kingdom of
Year 1266-1269
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Reale
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Crowned bust of Charles I of Anjou facing right, wearing a jewelled crown and draped mantle, holding a fleur-de-lis sceptre in the left hand. The effigy is rendered in high relief in the characteristic hammered style of 13th-century Angevin coinage. The legend encircles the bust in Gothic script, interrupted by pellets or crosses as dividers. The portrait conveys a strong regal presence consistent with early Angevin iconographic conventions.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Carlo I's Reale d'oro was introduced immediately after his victory over Manfred at Benevento in February 1266, a battle that ended Hohenstaufen rule in southern Italy and delivered the Kingdom of Sicily to the Angevins. The coin was a deliberate monetary statement — Carlo needed to establish financial credibility fast, having arrived in Italy heavily in debt to Florentine banking houses that had financed his campaign at papal instigation.

The type was struck only within this narrow three-year window before Carlo reformed his coinage. Friederich Friedberg assigns it Fr#75; Chimienti's tighter cataloguing at #137 reflects distinctions in die work that Friedberg's earlier scholarship did not fully disaggregate.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE