Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Principality of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (German States) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1795 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 2.33 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | The obverse features the prancing horse of Brunswick, depicted in high relief facing left with its right foreleg raised, standing upon a ground line with stylized grass tufts beneath. The mint master initials M·C· appear in the exergue below the ground line. A circular Latin legend surrounds the central device, reading CAROLVS GVIL · FERD · D · G · DVX BR · ET L · M · C ·, identifying Duke Charles William Ferdinand of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel by his Latinized title. The overall style is consistent with late 18th-century German princely coinage. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | CAROLVS GVIL · FERD · D · G · DVX BR · ET L · M · C · |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Charles William Ferdinand, the reigning Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel from 1780, was the Prussian field marshal mortally wounded at Auerstedt in 1806 — making 1795 one of his final peacetime years before the Napoleonic wars consumed the region entirely. A silver pattern for a one-pfennig denomination is a deliberate contradiction: the coin's face value was among the lowest in circulation, yet here struck in a precious metal, almost certainly produced for presentation or court approval rather than any genuine minting proposal. Whether it progressed beyond a single trial striking is unrecorded.