Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Banco de España |
|---|---|
| Year | 1948 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Brown intaglio print over blue, ochre, and brown guilloche underprint. Central vignette presents a limestone bust of the Dame of Elche in left-facing profile, rendered in classical style. Geometric border designs frame the perimeter, with fine-line patterning filling the background field. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | 1 |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
By 1948, the peseta had been through a decade of post-Civil War monetary disorder, and the Banco de España was still issuing fractional paper largely because coin shortages — partly a product of wartime metal diversion and partly of Franco-era economic mismanagement — made low-denomination coinage unreliable in circulation. The 1 peseta note filled that gap pragmatically.
López Sánchez-Toda was one of the FNMT's most technically accomplished engravers of the mid-century period, and his work on this series reflects the intaglio precision the Madrid facility was capable of at its best. The small format demanded tight engraving discipline — there is little room for error at that scale.
Pick #135 is one of several 1 peseta types from this period that collectors frequently conflate; the 1948 date distinguishes it from the superficially similar 1951 issue.