See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Paika - Muhammad bin Tughluq

Issuer Delhi Sultanate
Year 1325-1351
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Paika (1⁄48)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field bearing the Arabic honorific inscription 'Al-imam al-adil' (The Just Imam) rendered in bold Naskh script. The legend occupies the majority of the flan in multiple lines, characteristic of the South Indian type issues of Muhammad bin Tughluq. The hammered flan is irregular in shape with typical die alignment of the period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering الامام العادل
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Muhammad bin Tughluq's monetary experiments are among the most disastrous in medieval Indian history. Around 1329, he introduced a token currency in copper and brass intended to substitute for silver tanka — a scheme so aggressively counterfeited by the general population that merchants refused the coins entirely and the sultan was eventually forced to redeem the debased tokens at face value from the treasury, reportedly ruining the royal finances in the process. Ibn Battuta, who served at the Delhi court, documented the collapse firsthand.

Whether this specific paika denomination circulated during the token currency crisis or predates it remains a point of scholarly dispute.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE