Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Duchy of Saxe-Hildburghausen (German States) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1716-1717 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Thaler (1680-1759) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Central field bears the conjoined ligature HH (for Hildburghausen Heller) in bold capital letters at the top, flanked by two five-pointed stars at either side. Below the ligature appears the denomination legend HELLER in large capital letters, followed by the date 1716 in the lower field. A single five-pointed star ornament is placed beneath the date. The rim is defined by a milled border consistent with the obverse. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Saxe-Hildburghausen was among the smallest and most financially precarious of the Ernestine duchies, carved out of the Saxon partition in 1680 and perpetually near insolvency. Ernest Frederick I ruled a territory so strapped that imperial creditors repeatedly intervened in duchy finances during his reign. The heller was the lowest denomination in circulation — issuing even this coin was, for Hildburghausen, a statement of administrative function rather than economic strength.
The two-year production window of 1716–1717 is narrow enough to suggest a specific, short-term coinage need rather than routine mint output.