See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Gulden Utrecht arms, year obverse

Issuer States of Utrecht (Dutch Republic)
Year 1682-1687
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Gulden
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The allegorical figure of the Dutch Maid (Nederlandsche Maagd) stands facing, draped in classical robes, leaning with her left arm upon a Bible resting atop a fluted column, symbolising faith and civic virtue. In her right hand she holds an upright spear surmounted by a Liberty cap (Phrygian cap), the traditional emblem of freedom. The figure is rendered in a stately, baroque style typical of Dutch provincial silver coinage of the late seventeenth century. The circular Latin legend encircles the design within a beaded border.
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Utrecht's gulden series of the 1680s was struck against the backdrop of the Nine Years' War buildup, when the Dutch provincial mints were under mounting pressure to fund William III's military campaigns against Louis XIV. Utrecht maintained its own coinage authority jealously — the seven provinces never fully surrendered minting rights to a central authority, which is precisely why provincial arms coinage like this persisted well into the confederation's later decades. Die consistency across the 1682–1687 run is uneven; collectors working the Delmonte references regularly encounter date variants with differing interpunctuation.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE