Catalog
| Issuer | Regenstein, County of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1566 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Fürstengroschen (1⁄12) |
| Currency | Thaler |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | |
| Diameter | 25 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round |
| Technique | |
| Orientation | |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | MB#23, Schro/Deni#126a, Saur#4275 |
| Obverse description | Shield of 4-fold arms divide date, ornate helmet above. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | ERNS. PO. - E. CASP. V. |
| Reverse description | Crowned imperial eagle, orb on breast with 1Z. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | MAXI. D. - G. RO. IM. |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
1566 - (15)66 - |
| Numisquare ID | 6326058830 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: The 1566 1 Fürstengroschen was issued by the County of Regenstein under the joint rule of Counts Ernest I, Botho, and Caspar Ulrich. Situated within the Holy Roman Empire, Regenstein was a small but strategic territory in the Harz Mountains. This post-Reformation period saw territorial princes solidify their sovereignty and Münzrecht (right to mint coins). The Fürstengroschen, or "Prince's Groschen," underscored their princely status and economic authority, reflecting the complex political landscape of fragmented German states and shared familial rule.
Artistry: The design of this Fürstengroschen aligns with the prevailing Late Renaissance numismatic artistry of the German states. While the specific engraver is unrecorded, the dies were likely cut by a local mint master. The obverse typically features the conjoined titles and names of the three ruling counts, often arranged around a central motif. The reverse would display the intricate Regenstein coat of arms, frequently surmounted by a helmet and mantling, symbolizing their lineage and authority. The overall style emphasizes heraldic precision and legibility.
Technical/Grading: This silver 1 Fürstengroschen, measuring 25mm, was produced using traditional hammer-striking methods. Key high-points for grading include the definition of the heraldic elements on the reverse, particularly the helmet, crest, and intricate charges within the shield. On the obverse, the sharpness of the rulers' names and titles is crucial. A well-struck example will exhibit clear legends and crisp details, though minor planchet irregularities, slight off-centering, and evidence of die wear are common characteristics of 16th-century coinage.