Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Province of Utrecht (Dutch Republic) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1776 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Gulden (1581-1795) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Standing armored knight in full relief faces right, flanked by the divided date, grasping an upright sword in the right hand and a bundle of seven arrows in the left hand; a decorative scarf billows behind the figure. The knight's posture and martial attributes symbolize the unity and defense of the Dutch provinces. A circular Latin legend surrounds the entire design, terminating with the Utrecht mintmark. The overall style reflects the late Dutch Republic milled coinage tradition, with crisp detail characteristic of piedfort strikings. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Utrecht's standing soldier ducats of the mid-to-late eighteenth century were struck with unusual consistency, but piedfort multiples were produced outside the normal coining run — almost certainly as presentation pieces for civic officials, foreign dignitaries, or the stadtholder's court. A four-ducat-weight piedfort in gold is not a denomination; it is a demonstration, proof that the dies and the metal were both worthy of scrutiny.
The Delmonte gap is telling. Pieces of this type that escaped the standard reference literature tend to be survivors of small, undocumented presentation strikings rather than anything resembling circulation.