See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Dollar

Issuer General Bank of Communications
Year 1909
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) P#A17
Obverse description Green and yellow intaglio print on white paper with ornate guilloche border. Central vignette shows a steam ship dockside with a bustling Shanghai waterfront and multi-storey buildings to the right. Issuer title 'GENERAL BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS' at top, 'SHANGHAI' at centre, serial numbers flanking, and denomination 'ONE DOLLAR LOCAL CURRENCY' below the vignette.
Obverse lettering GENERAL BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS
SHANGHAI
ONE DOLLAR LOCAL CURRENCY
Promises to pay the Bearer on Demand at its Office here
Value Received
March 1st 1909
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

The General Bank of Communications (交通銀行) was established by imperial edict in 1907 to consolidate control over railways, telegraph, and postal services under a single financial institution — a structural ambition that proved difficult to sustain after 1911. Notes issued in 1909 predate the Republic by two years, placing this dollar firmly in the Qing dynasty's last, increasingly unstable phase of monetary reform.

The Chung Ming Printing Association was one of a small number of Shanghai-based printers producing banknotes for Chinese institutions before foreign security printers dominated the market. Their output from this period is generally considered technically inferior to contemporaneous De La Rue or American Bank Note Company work, which may explain the eventual shift in printing contracts.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE