Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | County of East Frisia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1562-1563 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A displayed imperial eagle with spread wings, crowned, occupies the central field, rendered in the heraldic style typical of 16th-century German coinage. The eagle's breast bears a small shield with the East Frisian harpy device. The date, rendered with a 'Z' as a period numeral substitute (e.g. 156Z for 1562), appears at the top of the field flanking the crown. A circular Latin legend in the outer ring contains the religious invocation for peace, separated from the eagle by a beaded inner border. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1562 - (15)6Z - 1562 - 156Z - 1563 - (15)63 - |
| Additional information |
The "Dicker Penning" — thick penny — was a denomination peculiar to East Frisian coinage, issued during a period when the county was governed jointly by three Cirksena brothers: Edzard II, Christoph, and John. The joint rule arrangement, forced by inheritance convention rather than political harmony, was characteristically fractious; the brothers spent much of the early 1560s negotiating internal divisions of territory and revenue that would eventually partition the county.
The two-year window of 1562–1563 likely reflects the precise overlap before administrative separation made unified coinage impractical.