See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

1 Denarius - Imitating Marcus Aurelius, 161-180 Group 1

Issuer Taman, Goths from
Year 250-275
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Denarius
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Crude barbarian imitation of a Roman imperial reverse type, featuring a schematically rendered standing figure, likely imitating a deity or emperor in a pose derived from official Marcus Aurelius denarius reverses. The design is executed in a highly degenerate style with roughly incuse or weakly struck elements typical of Gothic imitative issues from the Taman peninsula. A debased and partially legible Latin legend borders the scene, composed of repeated letter-like strokes derived from the Roman prototype but largely stripped of meaning.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Gothic silver imitations of Roman denarii began appearing in substantial numbers during the mid-third century, produced by craftsmen working from circulating Roman prototypes rather than official dies. The groups classified by Sergeev represent distinct production clusters, likely tied to specific tribal workshops operating in the Taman Peninsula region — a chokepoint between the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov that made it a persistent zone of Gothic commercial and military activity during Rome's Crisis of the Third Century.

The "cf." designation against Sergeev 299 signals an imprecise match — close enough to anchor attribution, not close enough to confirm it outright.